Recent vampire romance fad has gotten out of hand
Contributing WriterLast Updated Sunday, 29 August 2010 18:21
Vampires have gone a long way since Blade (1998), Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997), and Angel (1999) came into the public eye.
Vampires have gone a long way since Blade (1998), Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997), and Angel (1999) came into the public eye.
Vampires have gone a long way since Blade (1998), Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997), and Angel (1999) came into the public eye.
But for certain reasons, the vampire fad today has left me wanting more. It might simply be the poor acting that has left my viewing experiences unappeased, or it could be the generic storylines that are unraveling before my eyes.
The immense popularity of the Twilight franchise and the various vampire-centric television series leaves questions about our nation’s addiction—especially why. It is clear that these charming bloodsuckers have got a grip on the hearts of both the young and the old. The obsession has gone so far that we have begun to lash back against the fad with comedy. For instance, the summer flick Vampires Suck pieced together an array of weird, awkward, and laughable moments from the popular vampire trilogy to highlight the ridiculousness of the craze.
Vampires Suck is a satire on the vampire franchise and focuses on imitating the stoic and cliché acting present in the Twilight series. The performances in Vampires Suck are deliberately done with even worse acting than that which exists in Twilight. The goal of this satire is to partially play off of the popularity of everything vampire-related as well as point out the failures of the phenomenon on a whole.
Unfortunately, the movie fails to deliver. The main reasons for its failure, which include storyline problems and bad acting, ironically also reflect issues that are commonly found in several vampire-related movies and shows. If enough people realize and reject this poor artistic development, it could ultimately lead to the demise of the whole vampire phenomenon.
However, the clichéd phase has been running since the 1990s, and almost all vampire series consist of general stereotypes played out consistently one after the other. Besides the characteristics of what a vampire must entail, such as drinking blood and super strength, the storylines usually deal with a typical girl relentlessly pursuing a male vampire because of love. Not to get the wrong idea, as romance is okay to have as long as it’s not drenched to the point where the plot is simply vampire boy meets girl, girl finds out he is a vampire, thus they fall deeply in love. The generic foundation for these shows will soon become uninspiring. As a result, movies such as Vampires Suck have to be made to illustrate the lack of diversity amongst such films.
Recent popular series like Vampire Diaries and Twilight are prime examples of the use of sexual appeal and romance to captivate the younger audiences. To witness a Burger King commercial where people decide whether they want Edward or Jacob, characters from the Twilight saga definitely leads me to believe that fans are in it for character obsessions as opposed to the movie itself. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to trash anyone’s perception of the Twilight series, but how many more shows based on simple vampire romance can we tolerate?
Personally, my fascination for vampires has rapidly decreased simply because of the overbearing vampire affiliations present in the media today. Some exceptions are True Blood, an HBO series that uses more of a comedic southern twist over its romantic undertones and The Gates, containing a huge resemblance to Desperate Housewives with its community-based affairs. I believe that these series add an unusual twist to the vampire formula, making the plot more memorable for the viewer.
What is certain is that the movie Vampires Suck, though lacking in actual funny comedy, does prove a point: teenage fiction media has digressed to a shallow, mundane pool.